David Rigby
Given at the Techtextil Conference, Frankfurt, Germany April
1999
THE INDUSTRY AND ITS MARKETS
ARE CHANGING
THE PROBLEMS OF GROWTH
The technical textiles and nonwovens industries continue to
grow. At the same time, however, they and their markets are
changing and companies involved need to review their strategies
to ensure that they maximise their chances of success. The
following are among the important trends to which businesses
must adapt.
MARKET PULL
The industry has evolved significantly over the last 20 years.
It was initially based on textile production techniques, such
as weaving; the emphasis then changed to types of product,
such as filter media; it has recently switched in many areas
to focusing on the needs of particular market segments and
customers. Over the years, end-use customers have learnt about
the potential of technical textile and nonwoven-based products
and are now able to state very clearly their performance needs.
In this sense, they are creating a market pull for products
which increasingly are complex assemblies of which technical
textiles and nonwovens form only a part.
SUPPLY CHAINS
The increase in the power of the final customers and the emergence
of more complex products aimed at very specific end-uses has
led in some areas to the creation of supply chains dedicated
to particular customers and end-uses. The following are some
of the features commonly found in these supply chains:
- driven by the needs of the final customer
- members at several production stages
- collaborative development by members of materials, components
and finished products
- shorter delivery lead-times, including Just-in-Time where
necessary
- planned cost reduction and quality improvement programmes.
VERTICAL INTEGRATION
The increasingly tight performance targets set within these
supply chains is leading some businesses to integrate either
forwards or backwards to improve their levels of control over
quality and service and to increase the added value retained
by them. Examples include:
- coating equipment being installed by producers of sewer
linings (backwards)
- nonwovens manufacturers carrying out laminating (forwards)
- technical weavers integrating both ways by
- inline coating (forwards)
- texturising of yarns (backwards).
HORIZONTAL INTEGRATION
Similarly, companies are buying businesses making similar
products in order to achieve economies of scale and/or greater
geographical market coverage. Some are acquiring businesses
making different, but complementary, types of product in order
to satisfy a wider range of requirements for their key customers.
This is often preceded by a period of sourcing products from
other businesses, which is another growing activity in response
to changing market needs.
TECHNOLOGY CHANGES
Nonwovens is the major area in which technology is moving
on. There are new fibres (eg elastomeric, super-absorbent)
and new fabric forming techniques such as the co-extrusion
of spunbond and meltblown polymers to form laminated materials
(eg SMMS). In other areas of technical textiles the emphasis
is largely on using the already vast array of materials and
processes to design better products and to address new market
needs.
HOW SHOULD TECHNICAL TEXTILE
COMPANIES RESPOND TO CHANGE?
THERE IS A CLEAR NEED FOR GOOD
STRATEGIC PLANNING
There is a clear need for technical textile companies to take
a well-considered approach to deciding on their future strategies
and action plans to ensure that they adapt to change. The
question arises as how best they can do this. In the past
two years DRA have carried out strategic planning consulting
assignments with five technical textiles companies operating
internationally. These projects have covered a wide variety
of production and value-adding technologies, all the high
volume end-use market sectors and many speciality product/market
combinations.
THERE ARE SOME COMMON STRATEGIC ISSUES
In all these consulting projects we have used a system of
segmenting the company into strategic business units (SBUs),
and into strategic product/market segments (SPMSs) within
each SBU, for purposes of analysis. Within this overall approach
we found in all these projects that we have had to investigate
and resolve issues in the following areas in helping the company
to decide on future strategies:
- Choosing an appropriate product/market/customer focus
and a basic method of competition (choosing the business
model).
- The different levels of maturity of SBUs and SPMSs and
the different strategies they require.
- New product development (NPD).
- The structure of supply chains, where value is added
and retained and who the major decision-makers (channel
captains) are.
DECIDING ON PRODUCT/MARKET/CUSTOMER
FOCUS
Many technical textiles and nonwovens businesses have become
unfocused over the years; they have too many products, markets
and customers. Market pressures are now leading companies
to become more focused and to have a clear view of how they
will compete in the future. We have developed two models to
help companies to achieve a tighter market and business focus.
The first is shown in Exhibit 1.
EXHIBIT 1: COMPANY FOCUS
TYPES OF BUSINESS

This shows how every technical textiles business (SBU) can
be classified as being one of three generic types. The first
type (Production Based) is focused on a particular technology
(eg spunbonding, weaving, coating) as indicated by the heavy
point at the apex of the triangle. It makes a few different
products (eg fabrics, roll-goods types) and services many
end-use markets (eg automotive, wipes, hygiene, medical).
The triangle therefore broadens out progressively through
products towards customers and markets. The second type of
business (Product Based) concentrates on a particular type
of product (eg filter media), it uses several production technologies
(eg weaving, spunlacing, thermal bonding) and serves many
end-use sectors. The triangle diagram therefore has a focus
at the product/end-use level, indicated again by the heavy
point. The third type of business (Customer/Market Based)
concentrates on a particular end-use sector (eg automotive,
hygiene) and supplies a number of products using several production
technologies and often includes outsourcing in its activities.
We find that discussion of this simple model, using fairly
crude data on the market and on the businesss sales
and margins by product and customer, can quickly lead to a
high degree of strategic insight for our clients about their
current business and how it should be evolved into the future.
This model is a simplification of one we presented to the
Techtextil Symposium in 1995 (1).
VALUE DISCIPLINES HOW TO
COMPETE
Closely allied to this is a model of how a business actually
competes now and how it should compete in the future based
on three alternative value disciplines (2).
EXHIBIT 2: VALUE DISCIPLINES
(i) Operational Excellence:
a low cost producer based on best technology, lean manufacturing
and high capacity
utilisation. These tend to be high volume, low margin businesses.
(ii) Product/service Leadership:
a problem-solving business using several technologies. Often
low volume, high margin
businesses with surplus capacities.
(iii) Customer/market Focus:
concentrating on supplying the continuing product and service
needs of a particular
customer set or market segment.
Again, we find that the discussion of this model with clients
using crude market and company data can lead rapidly to the
identification of key strategic issues. In applying both these
models we carry out a strategic analysis of the company, its
SBUs and SPMSs which includes consideration both of the markets
the company is in and of its relative competitive strength
in those markets. This latter involves a clear definition
following a detailed discussion of the companys distinctive
capabilities, core competences, strengths and weaknesses.
SOME PARTS OF THE BUSINESS ARE MORE MATURE THAN OTHERS
AND NEED DIFFERENT STRATEGIES
Experience has shown that a companys SBUs and SPMSs
can typically be classified into one of the three levels of
maturity shown, with examples, in Exhibit 3. At the heart
of any technical textiles business there is usually 60-80%
of its sales which come from a small number of generic or
speciality intermediate products sold to a few customers with
whom special, and often long-term, relationships have been
established. These generate the bulk of the businesss
sales and profits and provide financial stability. The strategic
issues for this type of business usually involve finding ways
of holding on to and evolving important relationships by means
of cost reduction, product evolution, improved service etc.
Some of them ultimately evolve into businesses in their own
right (the highest level of maturity) and the significance
of the technical textiles often recedes to that of being just
one of the material components of fairly standard value added
products, such as surgical procedure packs and interlinings,
which have quite specific functional end-uses. The strategic
issues for these products usually concern how to achieve the
economies of scale necessary to compete against more focused
competitors. Mergers and acquisitions to service better the
target end-use market segments and to achieve wider geographical
market reach are often an important way forward for businesses
of this type.
EXHIBIT 3: THREE LEVELS OF PRODUCT/MARKET SEGMENT MATURITY
| Level of product/ market
segment maturity |
Evolved technical textiles
based business |
Generic or speciality
technical textiles intermediates |
New technical textiles
product development |
| Examples |
-
interlinings
-
packaged consumer wipes
-
surgical procedure packs
|
-
roll-goods for hygiene
-
filtration fabrics
-
cable wrap tapes
|
-
new materials eg microfibres,
SAF, elastomerics
-
new end-uses eg UV absorption
|
| Typical characteristics |
-
nonwovens is just one of the raw
materials
-
a range of standardised products
-
distribution needed
-
branding & promotion
-
private-label manufacturing
-
margins depend on competitive pressures
|
- nonwovens are final product
- high volumes
- few customers
- relationships with customers and suppliers
- contract supply
- collaborative evolutionary product/service development
- high margins
|
- innovation
- products to solve identified new problems
- collaboration with customers and end-users on
problems and solutions
- often loss making: treated as a cost-centre
- the "seed-corn" of the overall business
|
| Strategic issues |
- economies of scale
- market share
- widening market reach
- possibility of sourcing nonwovens
- mergers, acquisitions
|
- vulnerability to technical obsolescence
- how to reduce costs, improve quality and service?
- how to deepen relationships with customers?
|
- how big a portfolio of projects?
- how much to spend?
- who to collaborate with?
- how to focus: by technology, by end-use etc?
|
NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT
CREATING THE FUTURE OF THE BUSINESS
At the other end of the maturity scale is the third type of
activity, new product development (NPD), which we find is
badly targeted and managed by most companies. The key to success
here is to focus the vast majority of scarce NPD resources
(people and money) on to problems which specific customers
have identified now and want a solution to quickly. Solving
non-problems, or producing solutions to problems before they
are needed, are both very wasteful in resource and demotivating
to NPD staff. A good NPD programme will have the following
characteristics:
- A clear distinction is made among three different technical
activities: true NPD, the technical evolution of existing
products, and production trouble-shooting. Different budgets
(and ideally staff) should be applied to each of them.
- An outline cost-benefit analysis will be carried out on
each potential project comparing the likely resulting pattern
of sales volumes and margins with the likely pattern of
expenditure and the probability of success.
- Clear priorities are allocated to the possible projects;
the top priority classification should contain as few projects
as possible. The potential strategic impact of success of
these projects individually, and together, should be assessed.
- NPD projects should have clearly defined budgets, timescales
and milestones which should be reviewed monthly.
ARE YOU OPTIMISING YOUR SUPPLY
CHAIN POSITIONS?
There are two generic types of supply chain in the technical
textiles industry: processing and assembly. Some chains have
elements of both.
EXHIBIT 4: TYPES OF SUPPLY CHAIN

Pressure from ultimate specifiers and end-users is forcing
more, and better organised, supply chains to be created in
many product areas. Technical textiles producers are at the
very early stage in these chains and are likely to have little
commercial power unless steps are taken to avoid this. Successful
action requires a clear understanding of the supply chain
and the power structures within it. In particular, it is important
to identify the real decision-maker in the chain and how he
can be influenced. Successful strategies of supply chain membership
often include:
- Forming trust-based, long-term, collaborative, developmental
relationships with both suppliers and customers
- Agreements on the types and pace of the required cost
reductions and improvements in products and services
- Location of production near to the customers point
of use
- Sharing systems (and sometimes staff) with suppliers
and customers
- Back-selling to the ultimate specifier or end-user
- Strong protection of intellectual property
- Component branding
- Value pricing.
DRA have developed methods of analysing supply chains and
how they create value which can be used both to understand
a companys current position in its supply chain and
how it could be improved and to plan entry into new supply
chains.
THE OPPORTUNITIES ARE THERE TO
BE GRASPED
Not many industries, particularly those which are textile-related,
can match the past high growth rates of the technical textiles
sector. The fundamental market drivers for technical textile
products continue to grow worldwide: GDP, disposable income,
agricultural production, car production, demand for improved
hygiene and better healthcare etc so that strong market growth
can be expected to continue. Those companies with the right
strategies can look forward to a profitable future. References
(1) Strategies for Technical Textile Producers in the
Late 1990s, David Rigby, Techtextil Symposium, 1995.
Reprinted in Technical Textile Markets, October 1995.
(2) How to Focus your Technical Textile Business, David Rigby,
Technical Textiles International, December 1996/January 1997.
Reprinted in the report "The Technical Textile Industry and
its Markets: Prospects to 2000" prepared by DRA for Messe
Frankfurt.
|